Tuesday, January 1, 2008

Remote control of Ham stations, also - Echo Link What do you think?

I was reading the reviews on the Ten Tec Omni VII on Eham.net. For those of you that don't know what an Omni VII is, it is a new Ten Tec radio (within the past year or two) that has built-in Ethernet compatibility. That means you can plug the radio directly in to CAT-5 cable and through your network router in to the Internet - just as you would a computer in your home - and access the radio through the Internet to operate it remotely.

One guy posted on there about having another QTH and wanting to put one of these rigs there. When the propagation at his normal QTH is bad he can connect to the other rig through the Internet and bingo-blamo have an instant new QTH HIHI.

Isn't the "hobby" of Ham radio supposed to be wireless and usable when all other means are down? Where, then, does Internet remote control and Echo Link fall in the grand scheme of things?

My opinion is Ham radio is radios, and all that term encompasses (antennas, power supplies, transmission lines, user-interfaces (IE, CW key, mic, computer - digital modes/logging/computer control)). When you toss in an Internet connection you immediately suck the life out of Ham radio, in my honest opinion. How can you sit in front of a laptop miles from your QTH in Boise, ID, while on vacation at, say, Argentina, and be talking on the radio saying you are in Boise, ID??? Or, even WORSE - the other way around.

I also don't like the concept of Echo Link. I used to talk on that before I was able to get on HF. I used a repeater system and was able to dial in other repeater systems around the world. This gave me my "fix" on international communications, but boy was it short lived. For emergency communications or reliable every-day communications it is great. Dial in the code for whatever repeater or station (given they are echo link capable) and you can talk to someone on that system. It's almost like a telephone. However, in normal situations a telephone or Internet connection is going to be the better choice, I think.

What really disgusted me with Echo Link is the Internet. When you talk to another Ham through that system the Internet is taking your signal from here to there. Not radio waves and propagation. There is no skill or "magic" to dialing up a repeater on echo link and picking up a microphone and saying "hey buddy whats the weather like over there?". There IS, however, skill and "magic" in directly scrolling through the frequencies on HF and listening to the radio spectrum AS IT IS and finding that station to talk to.

I can wrap my brain around the concept of the remote station - the station is where it is, thus that is the origin of your signal - not Argentina. I just find the concept to be dumb - it sucks out the magic and the true meaning of Ham radio.

I don't mean to slam Ten Tec in their efforts, and I don't mean to speak badly about the Omni VII. Ten Tec is a fabulous company. If you don't think so I think you need to re-study their history and sit down with their current HF radios/receivers. I just think that the use of the Internet as a link in your communications system is a joke.

What do you think?

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think your missing the point - you don't know who is going to answer. The telephone system requires you to know who is most likely to answer. Not so with radio, regardless if direct or remote. For some, that is the excitement, exploring the unknown that may or may not answer you.

john (:>))) KC7NVE

April 15, 2008 at 8:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well I think the idea is interesting. I personally don't see myself operating from a different QTH, but I could sit downstairs with my wife, she watching American
Idol, while I operate CW on 80 meters! This way I'm not some oaf locked away in the shack. We can be together. Makes her happy.
:-)
Paul KD1PL

January 17, 2009 at 6:01 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home